Fluidstack
vs
Shadeform
What's good about each
- Managed Slurm and Kubernetes clusters on bare metal
- Active and passive cluster health checks with observability
- ClusterMAX Gold rating from SemiAnalysis
- Custom data centers built for a single customer's workload
- Launch instances anywhere with a single console and API
- Leverage a multi-cloud set up, without the hassle
- You can reserve instances in advance to ensure GPU availability
- Free to use, zero mark-up fees
Services
Managed services each provider offers.
| Service | Fluidstack | Shadeform |
|---|---|---|
| GPU-powered Servers | ||
| Managed Containers | ||
| Virtual Private Server (VPS) |
Company details
| Fact | Fluidstack | Shadeform |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2017 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | USA | USA |
| Locations | 4 | -- |
| Example customers | -- | University of California Berkeley, Magic Studio, Neets.ai, MK1 |
| Website | www.fluidstack.io | shadeform.com |
Alternatives to consider
Compare Fluidstack and Shadeform against other cloud providers.
Our data for Fluidstack was last updated on Aug. 31, 2026, and for Shadeform on July 9, 2026.