Fluidstack
vs
Shadeform
What's good about each
- Managed Slurm and Kubernetes clusters on bare metal
- Active and passive cluster health checks with observability
- ClusterMAX Gold rating from SemiAnalysis
- Custom data centers built for a single customer's workload
- Launch instances anywhere with a single console and API
- Leverage a multi-cloud set up, without the hassle
- You can reserve instances in advance to ensure GPU availability
- Free to use, zero mark-up fees
Services
Managed services each provider offers.
| Service | Fluidstack | Shadeform |
|---|---|---|
| GPU-powered Servers | ||
| Managed Containers | ||
| Virtual Private Server (VPS) |
Compliance
Frameworks each provider states on its own site, each linked to its source.
Heads up: Each entry links to the provider's own statement. An attestation can cover one tier, one region or the platform alone rather than every service. Verify the scope before you rely on it. A dash means we found nothing to link to, not that the provider lacks it.
Company details
| Fact | Fluidstack | Shadeform |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2017 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | USA | USA |
| Locations | 4 | -- |
| Example customers | -- | University of California Berkeley, Magic Studio, Neets.ai, MK1 |
| Website | www.fluidstack.io | shadeform.com |
Alternatives to consider
Compare Fluidstack and Shadeform against other cloud providers.
Our data for Fluidstack was last updated on Sept. 18, 2026, and for Shadeform on Sept. 18, 2026.