Fluidstack
vs
Replicate
Both sell GPU compute for AI. Fluidstack contracts bare metal clusters for model training and publishes no rates, while Replicate runs A100 to H200 models behind an API and bills per second.
What's good about each
- Managed Slurm and Kubernetes clusters on bare metal
- Active and passive cluster health checks with observability
- ClusterMAX Gold rating from SemiAnalysis
- Custom data centers built for a single customer's workload
GPUs
Replicate offers 5 GPU models. We track no GPU listings from Fluidstack. Cheapest listed price per GPU per hour; GPUs both providers sell come first.
| GPU | Fluidstack | Replicate | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
-- | $5.49 /GPU/hr On-demand | Replicate only |
|
|
-- | $5.49 /GPU/hr On-demand | Replicate only |
|
|
-- | $5.04 /GPU/hr On-demand | Replicate only |
|
|
-- | $3.51 /GPU/hr On-demand | Replicate only |
|
|
-- | $0.81 /GPU/hr On-demand | Replicate only |
Replicate bills on-demand. The line under each price names the billing type shown.
Services
Managed services each provider offers.
| Service | Fluidstack | Replicate |
|---|---|---|
| GPU-powered Servers |
Company details
| Fact | Fluidstack | Replicate |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2017 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | USA | USA |
| Locations | 4 | -- |
| Example customers | -- | BuzzFeed, Labelbox, PhotoAI, Character.ai, Magnific, Unsplash, HeadshotPro |
| Website | www.fluidstack.io | replicate.com |
Alternatives to consider
Compare Fluidstack and Replicate against other cloud providers.
Our data for Fluidstack was last updated on Sept. 18, 2026, and for Replicate on Oct. 2, 2026.