Backblaze
vs
Fluidstack
What's good about each
- A fraction of the cost of AWS S3
- Easy migration, S3-compatible API
- Several data centers in North America and Europe
- Managed Slurm and Kubernetes clusters on bare metal
- Active and passive cluster health checks with observability
- ClusterMAX Gold rating from SemiAnalysis
- Custom data centers built for a single customer's workload
Price comparison
Closest matching configuration on each side, monthly list price in USD.
| Service | Backblaze | Fluidstack | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Object storage | $6.00 /mo 1 TB | -- Not listed | |
| Egress allowance | 3x the amount of data stored | -- Not listed | |
| Egress | $10.00 /TB $0.01 / GB | -- Not listed |
Heads up: Figures take each provider's closest plan to a common setup, and vary by region and usage. Hover a service for the reference configuration. Verify before provisioning. More on how we price.
Services
Managed services each provider offers.
| Service | Backblaze | Fluidstack |
|---|---|---|
| GPU-powered Servers | ||
| Object Storage |
Company details
| Fact | Backblaze | Fluidstack |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2007 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | USA | USA |
| Locations | 4 | 4 |
| Example customers | Kanopy, Steamlabs, Canal+, Fortune | -- |
| Website | www.backblaze.com | www.fluidstack.io |
Alternatives to consider
Compare Backblaze and Fluidstack against other cloud providers.
Our data for Backblaze was last updated on Feb. 12, 2026, and for Fluidstack on Aug. 31, 2026.