AMD MI250
vs
Nvidia GH200
The MI250 has 33% more memory, while the GH200 is newer and has 25% more bandwidth.
At a glance
Memory
33% more on MI250
- MI250
- 128 GB
- GH200
- 96 GB
Memory bandwidth
25% higher on GH200
- MI250
- 3.20 TB/s
- GH200
- 4.00 TB/s
Cheapest on-demand
MI250 is not sold on demand
- MI250
- --
- GH200
- $3.87 /GPU/hr
Price comparison
Median price per GPU per hour by billing type, with the cheapest listing under it.
| Billing | MI250 | GH200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| On-demand | No on-demand listings | -- /GPU/hr from $3.87 | |
| Reserved | -- /GPU/hr from $1.30 (12 mo) | No reserved listings | |
| Spot | No spot listings | Sold out |
Heads up: A provider's own page may quote a different figure, for example on tax, region or a promotion. A monthly-only plan shows a derived hourly rate. Medians are across providers, one vote each, so a large catalog does not outweigh a small one. No median for reserved on the MI250 and on-demand on the GH200: we only show one when at least 3 providers list the GPU on that billing type. Verify before provisioning. More on how we price.
Price history
MI250 vs GH200 price history
Weekly median on-demand price per GPU per hour
Specs comparison
| Spec | MI250 | GH200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory | |||
| Capacity | 128 GB HBM2e | 96 GB HBM3 | 33% more on MI250 |
| Bandwidth | 3,200 GB/s | 4,000 GB/s | 25% higher on GH200 |
| Bus width | 8,192-bit | ||
| Compute · dense | |||
| FP8 | Not supported | 1,979 TFLOPS | GH200 only |
| FP16 / BF16 | 362.1 TFLOPS | 989.5 TFLOPS | 2.7x higher on GH200 |
| INT8 | 362.1 TOPS | 1,979 TOPS | 5.5x higher on GH200 |
| FP32 | 90.5 TFLOPS | 67 TFLOPS | 35% higher on MI250 |
| FP64 | 45.3 TFLOPS | 34 TFLOPS | 33% higher on MI250 |
| Platform | |||
| Interconnect | Infinity Fabric 400 GB/s | NVLink 900 GB/s | 2.2x higher on GH200 |
| Released | Q4 2021 | Q2 2023 | 2 years newer on GH200 |
| Precision | |||
| Supported formats | FP16BF16FP32FP64INT4INT8 | FP8FP16BF16TF32FP32FP64INT8 | |
Compute: Vendor peak figures, dense and per GPU. Not measured throughput.
Source: MI250 datasheet and GH200 datasheet.
Where to rent them
Providers that rent these GPUs, with each one's cheapest rate. No provider we track offers both right now.
| Provider | MI250 | GH200 |
|---|---|---|
Cirrascale
USA
|
$1.30 /GPU/hr Reserved | -- |
Denvr
Canada
|
-- | $3.87 /GPU/hr On-demand |
CoreWeave
USA
|
-- | $6.50 /GPU/hr On-demand |
Lambda Labs
USA
|
-- | $2.29 /GPU/hr On-demand |
Sesterce
France
|
-- | $2.52 /GPU/hr On-demand |
Vultr
USA
|
-- | $1.99 /GPU/hr Spot |
Similar GPUs
Other comparisons in the same class.
-
Nvidia A100
80 GB HBM2e · 40% less bandwidth than the MI250
From $0.34 /GPU/hr Compare
-
AMD MI300X
192 GB HBM3 · 66% more bandwidth than the MI250
From $2.59 /GPU/hr Compare
-
Nvidia V100
32 GB HBM2 · 72% less bandwidth than the MI250
From $0.11 /GPU/hr Compare
-
Nvidia H100
80 GB HBM3 · 16% less bandwidth than the GH200
From $1.30 /GPU/hr Compare
-
Nvidia H200
141 GB HBM3e · 20% more bandwidth than the GH200
From $2.09 /GPU/hr Compare
Our data for AMD MI250 was last updated on Sept. 14, 2026, and for Nvidia GH200 on Sept. 14, 2026.