The A10 has 39% more bandwidth, with the same 24 GB of memory. The RTX PRO 4000 SFF is newer and cheaper right now.
At a glance
Memory
Identical
- A10
- 24 GB
- RTX PRO 4000 SFF
- 24 GB
Memory bandwidth
39% higher on A10
- A10
- 600 GB/s
- RTX PRO 4000 SFF
- 432 GB/s
Cheapest on-demand
62% cheaper on RTX PRO 4000 SFF
- A10
- $1.00 /GPU/hr
- RTX PRO 4000 SFF
- $0.38 /GPU/hr
Price comparison
Median price per GPU per hour by billing type, with the cheapest listing under it.
| Billing | A10 | RTX PRO 4000 SFF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| On-demand | $1.63 /GPU/hr from $1.00 | -- /GPU/hr from $0.38 | |
| Reserved | -- /GPU/hr from $0.71 (12 mo) | No reserved listings | |
| Spot | -- /GPU/hr from $0.59 | No spot listings |
Heads up: A provider's own page may quote a different figure, for example on tax, region or a promotion. A monthly-only plan shows a derived hourly rate. Medians are across providers, one vote each, so a large catalog does not outweigh a small one. No median for reserved and spot on the A10 and on-demand on the RTX PRO 4000 SFF: we only show one when at least 3 providers list the GPU on that billing type. Verify before provisioning. More on how we price.
Price history
A10 vs RTX PRO 4000 SFF price history
Weekly median on-demand price per GPU per hour
Specs comparison
| Spec | A10 | RTX PRO 4000 SFF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory | |||
| Capacity | 24 GB GDDR6 | 24 GB GDDR7 | Identical |
| Bandwidth | 600 GB/s | 432 GB/s | 39% higher on A10 |
| Bus width | 384-bit | 192-bit | 2x wider on A10 |
| Compute · dense | |||
| FP4 | Not supported | 385 TFLOPS | RTX PRO 4000 SFF only |
| FP8 | Not supported | 192.5 TFLOPS | RTX PRO 4000 SFF only |
| FP16 / BF16 | 125 TFLOPS | 96.3 TFLOPS | 30% higher on A10 |
| INT8 | 250 TOPS | 192.5 TOPS | 30% higher on A10 |
| FP32 | 31.2 TFLOPS | 24 TFLOPS | 30% higher on A10 |
| Platform | |||
| Interconnect | PCIe only | PCIe only | |
| Board power | 150 W | 70 W | 2.1x higher on A10 |
| Released | Q2 2021 | Q3 2025 | 4 years newer on RTX PRO 4000 SFF |
| Precision | |||
| Supported formats | FP16BF16TF32FP32INT4INT8 | FP4FP8FP16BF16TF32FP32INT8 | |
Compute: Vendor peak figures, dense and per GPU. Not measured throughput.
Source: A10 datasheet and RTX PRO 4000 SFF datasheet.
Where to rent them
Providers that rent these GPUs, with each one's cheapest rate. No provider we track offers both right now.
| Provider | A10 | RTX PRO 4000 SFF |
|---|---|---|
Lambda Labs
USA
|
$1.29 /GPU/hr On-demand PCIe | -- |
Sesterce
France
|
$1.42 /GPU/hr On-demand | -- |
Runcrate
USA
|
$1.85 /GPU/hr On-demand PCIe | -- |
OVH
France
|
$1.00 /GPU/hr On-demand | -- |
Cerebrium
USA
|
$1.10 /GPU/hr On-demand | -- |
Alibaba Cloud
China
|
$1.27 /GPU/hr On-demand | -- |
Oracle Cloud
USA
|
$2.00 /GPU/hr On-demand | -- |
Azure
USA
|
$3.20 /GPU/hr On-demand | -- |
Hetzner
Germany
|
-- | $0.38 /GPU/hr On-demand |
Similar GPUs
Other comparisons in the same class.
-
-
-
-
Nvidia RTX PRO 4000
24 GB GDDR7 · 56% more bandwidth than the RTX PRO 4000 SFF
On-demand from $0.27 /GPU/hr
Our data for Nvidia A10 was last updated on Sept. 14, 2026, and for Nvidia RTX PRO 4000 SFF on Nov. 9, 2026.