AMD MI355X
vs
Nvidia A10
The MI355X is newer, with 12x the memory and 13x the bandwidth. The A10 is typically cheaper.
At a glance
Memory
12x more on MI355X
- MI355X
- 288 GB
- A10
- 24 GB
Memory bandwidth
13x higher on MI355X
- MI355X
- 8,000 GB/s
- A10
- 600 GB/s
Cheapest on-demand
83% cheaper on A10
- MI355X
- $5.99 /GPU/hr
- A10
- $1.00 /GPU/hr
Price comparison
Median price per GPU per hour by billing type, with the cheapest listing under it.
| Billing | MI355X | A10 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| On-demand | $8.04 /GPU/hr from $5.99 | $1.63 /GPU/hr from $1.00 | 80% cheaper on A10 |
| Reserved | -- /GPU/hr from $4.29 | -- /GPU/hr from $0.71 (12 mo) | |
| Spot | -- /GPU/hr from $3.44 | -- /GPU/hr from $0.59 |
Heads up: A provider's own page may quote a different figure, for example on tax, region or a promotion. A monthly-only plan shows a derived hourly rate. Medians are across providers, one vote each, so a large catalog does not outweigh a small one. No median for reserved and spot on the MI355X and reserved and spot on the A10: we only show one when at least 3 providers list the GPU on that billing type. Verify before provisioning. More on how we price.
Price history
MI355X vs A10 price history
Weekly median on-demand price per GPU per hour
Specs comparison
| Spec | MI355X | A10 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory | |||
| Capacity | 288 GB HBM3e | 24 GB GDDR6 | 12x more on MI355X |
| Bandwidth | 8,000 GB/s | 600 GB/s | 13x higher on MI355X |
| Bus width | 8,192-bit | 384-bit | 21x wider on MI355X |
| Compute · dense | |||
| FP4 | 10,066.3 TFLOPS | Not supported | MI355X only |
| FP8 | 5,033.2 TFLOPS | Not supported | MI355X only |
| FP16 / BF16 | 2,516.6 TFLOPS | 125 TFLOPS | 20x higher on MI355X |
| INT8 | 5,033.2 TOPS | 250 TOPS | 20x higher on MI355X |
| FP32 | 157.3 TFLOPS | 31.2 TFLOPS | 5x higher on MI355X |
| FP64 | 78.6 TFLOPS | Not supported | MI355X only |
| Platform | |||
| Interconnect | Infinity Fabric 1,075 GB/s | PCIe only | Infinity Fabric on MI355X only |
| Board power | 1,400 W | 150 W | 9.3x higher on MI355X |
| Released | Q2 2025 | Q2 2021 | 4 years newer on MI355X |
| Precision | |||
| Supported formats | FP4FP6FP8FP16BF16FP32FP64INT8 | FP16BF16TF32FP32INT4INT8 | |
Compute: Vendor peak figures, dense and per GPU. Not measured throughput.
Source: MI355X datasheet and A10 datasheet.
Where to rent them
Providers that rent these GPUs, with each one's cheapest rate. Providers that rent both are listed first.
| Provider | MI355X | A10 |
|---|---|---|
Oracle Cloud
USA
|
$8.60 /GPU/hr On-demand | $2.00 /GPU/hr On-demand |
Daytona
USA
|
$5.99 /GPU/hr On-demand | -- |
OpenRelay
USA
|
$6.30 /GPU/hr On-demand | -- |
Cirrascale
USA
|
$4.29 /GPU/hr Reserved | -- |
Impossible Cloud
Germany
|
$6.13 /GPU/hr Reserved | -- |
DigitalOcean
USA
|
$4.50 /GPU/hr Spot | -- |
TensorWave
USA
|
$2.95 /GPU/hr Custom OAM | -- |
Crusoe
USA
|
On request Custom | -- |
Lambda Labs
USA
|
-- | $1.29 /GPU/hr On-demand PCIe |
Sesterce
France
|
-- | $1.42 /GPU/hr On-demand |
Runcrate
USA
|
-- | $1.85 /GPU/hr On-demand PCIe |
OVH
France
|
-- | $1.00 /GPU/hr On-demand |
Cerebrium
USA
|
-- | $1.10 /GPU/hr On-demand |
Alibaba Cloud
China
|
-- | $1.27 /GPU/hr On-demand |
Azure
USA
|
-- | $3.20 /GPU/hr On-demand |
9 providers list the MI355X and 8 the A10. Every listing is on the MI355X page and the A10 page.
Similar GPUs
Other comparisons in the same class.
Our data for AMD MI355X was last updated on Sept. 14, 2026, and for Nvidia A10 on Sept. 14, 2026.