AMD MI300X
vs
Nvidia H200
Two data center GPUs, one CDNA 3 and one Hopper: 192 GB HBM3 against 141 GB HBM3e and 10% more memory bandwidth on the MI300X.
At a glance
Memory
- MI300X
- 192 GB
- H200
- 141 GB
1.4x more on MI300X
Memory bandwidth
- MI300X
- 5.30 TB/s
- H200
- 4.80 TB/s
1.1x higher on MI300X
Cheapest on-demand
- MI300X
- $2.39 /GPU/hr
- H200
- $2.09 /GPU/hr
13% cheaper on H200
Price comparison
Median price per GPU per hour by billing type, with the cheapest listing under it.
| Billing | MI300X | H200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| On-demand | $2.91 /GPU/hr from $2.39 | $4.40 /GPU/hr from $2.09 | 34% cheaper on MI300X |
| Reserved | $3.39 /GPU/hr from $1.61 (12 mo) | $3.65 /GPU/hr from $2.29 (1 mo) | 7% cheaper on MI300X |
| Spot | -- /GPU/hr from $1.60 | $3.01 /GPU/hr from $1.60 |
Heads up: A provider's own page may quote a different figure, for example on tax, region or a promotion. A monthly-only plan shows a derived hourly rate. Medians are across providers, one vote each, so a large catalog does not outweigh a small one. No median for spot on the MI300X: we only show one when at least 3 providers list the GPU on that billing type. Verify before provisioning. More on how we price.
Price history
MI300X vs H200 price history
Weekly median on-demand price per GPU per hour
Specs comparison
| Spec | MI300X | H200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory | |||
| Capacity | 192 GB HBM3 | 141 GB HBM3e | 1.4x more on MI300X |
| Bandwidth | 5,300 GB/s | 4,800 GB/s | 1.1x higher on MI300X |
| Bus width | 8,192-bit | ||
| Compute · dense | |||
| FP8 | 2,614.9 TFLOPS | 1,979 TFLOPS | 1.3x higher on MI300X |
| FP16 / BF16 | 1,307.4 TFLOPS | 989.5 TFLOPS | 1.3x higher on MI300X |
| INT8 | 2,614.9 TOPS | 1,979 TOPS | 1.3x higher on MI300X |
| FP32 | 163.4 TFLOPS | 67 TFLOPS | 2.4x higher on MI300X |
| FP64 | 81.7 TFLOPS | 34 TFLOPS | 2.4x higher on MI300X |
| Platform | |||
| Interconnect | Infinity Fabric 896 GB/s | NVLink 900 GB/s | Within 5% |
| Board power | 750 W | 700 W | 1.1x higher on MI300X |
| Released | Q4 2023 | Q4 2023 | |
| Precision | |||
| Supported formats | FP8FP16BF16TF32FP32FP64INT8 | FP8FP16BF16TF32FP32FP64INT8 | |
Compute: Vendor peak figures, dense and per GPU. Not measured throughput.
Source: MI300X datasheet and H200 datasheet.
Where to rent them
Providers listing these GPUs, those with both first, so you can switch without moving clouds.
| Provider | MI300X /GPU/hr | H200 /GPU/hr |
|---|---|---|
Runpod
|
On-Demand $2.39 | -- |
DigitalOcean
|
On-Demand $2.59 | -- |
Cyfuture AI
|
On-Demand $2.78 | -- |
Hot Aisle
|
On-Demand $2.99 | -- |
Oracle Cloud
|
On-Demand $6.00 | -- |
Azure
|
On-Demand $7.86 | -- |
Cirrascale
|
Reserved (12mo) $3.12 | -- |
Crusoe
|
Reservation on request | -- |
Lium
|
-- | On-Demand $2.90 |
Koyeb
|
-- | On-Demand $3.00 |
GPU.ai
|
-- | On-Demand $3.29 |
Massed Compute
|
-- | On-Demand $3.62 |
Vast.ai
|
-- | On-Demand $3.97 |
Verda
|
-- | On-Demand $4.00 |
Lyceum
|
-- | On-Demand $4.29 |
Runcrate
|
-- | On-Demand $4.40 |
10 providers list the MI300X and 46 the H200. Every listing is on the MI300X page and the H200 page.
Similar GPUs
Other comparisons in the same class.
Our data for AMD MI300X was last updated on Sept. 7, 2026, and for Nvidia H200 on Sept. 7, 2026.