AMD MI250
vs
Nvidia RTX PRO 6000D
The MI250 has 52% more memory and 2x the bandwidth.
At a glance
Memory
52% more on MI250
- MI250
- 128 GB
- RTX PRO 6000D
- 84 GB
Memory bandwidth
2x higher on MI250
- MI250
- 3.20 TB/s
- RTX PRO 6000D
- 1.57 TB/s
Cheapest on-demand
MI250 is not sold on demand
- MI250
- --
- RTX PRO 6000D
- $0.97 /GPU/hr
Price comparison
Median price per GPU per hour by billing type, with the cheapest listing under it.
| Billing | MI250 | RTX PRO 6000D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| On-demand | No on-demand listings | -- /GPU/hr from $0.97 | |
| Reserved | -- /GPU/hr from $1.30 (12 mo) | -- /GPU/hr from $1.21 (6 mo) | |
| Spot | No spot listings | -- /GPU/hr from $0.54 |
Heads up: A provider's own page may quote a different figure, for example on tax, region or a promotion. A monthly-only plan shows a derived hourly rate. Medians are across providers, one vote each, so a large catalog does not outweigh a small one. No median for reserved on the MI250 and on-demand, reserved and spot on the RTX PRO 6000D: we only show one when at least 3 providers list the GPU on that billing type. Verify before provisioning. More on how we price.
Price history
MI250 vs RTX PRO 6000D price history
Weekly median on-demand price per GPU per hour
Specs comparison
| Spec | MI250 | RTX PRO 6000D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory | |||
| Capacity | 128 GB HBM2e | 84 GB GDDR7 | 52% more on MI250 |
| Bandwidth | 3,200 GB/s | 1,568 GB/s | 2x higher on MI250 |
| Bus width | 8,192-bit | 448-bit | 18x wider on MI250 |
| Compute · dense | |||
| FP4 | Not supported | 1,553 TFLOPS | RTX PRO 6000D only |
| FP8 | Not supported | 776 TFLOPS | RTX PRO 6000D only |
| FP16 / BF16 | 362.1 TFLOPS | 388 TFLOPS | 7% higher on RTX PRO 6000D |
| INT8 | 362.1 TOPS | 776 TOPS | 2.1x higher on RTX PRO 6000D |
| FP32 | 90.5 TFLOPS | 97 TFLOPS | 7% higher on RTX PRO 6000D |
| FP64 | 45.3 TFLOPS | Not supported | MI250 only |
| Platform | |||
| Interconnect | Infinity Fabric 400 GB/s | PCIe only | Infinity Fabric on MI250 only |
| Board power | 500 W | 400 W | 25% higher on MI250 |
| Released | Q4 2021 | Q3 2025 | 4 years newer on RTX PRO 6000D |
| Precision | |||
| Supported formats | FP16BF16FP32FP64INT4INT8 | FP4FP8FP16BF16TF32FP32INT8 | |
Compute: Vendor peak figures, dense and per GPU. Not measured throughput.
Source: MI250 datasheet .
Where to rent them
Providers that rent these GPUs, with each one's cheapest rate. No provider we track offers both right now.
| Provider | MI250 | RTX PRO 6000D |
|---|---|---|
Cirrascale
USA
|
$1.30 /GPU/hr Reserved | -- |
GPUhub
Singapore
|
-- | $0.97 /GPU/hr On-demand |
Vast.ai
USA
|
-- | $1.26 /GPU/hr On-demand |
Similar GPUs
Other comparisons in the same class.
-
Nvidia A100
80 GB HBM2e · 40% less bandwidth than the MI250
From $0.34 /GPU/hr Compare
-
AMD MI300X
192 GB HBM3 · 66% more bandwidth than the MI250
From $2.59 /GPU/hr Compare
-
Nvidia V100
32 GB HBM2 · 72% less bandwidth than the MI250
From $0.09 /GPU/hr Compare
-
Nvidia RTX PRO 6000
96 GB GDDR7 · released Q1 2025
From $0.65 /GPU/hr Compare
-
Nvidia RTX 5090
32 GB GDDR7 · consumer card
From $0.35 /GPU/hr Compare
Our data for AMD MI250 was last updated on Sept. 14, 2026, and for Nvidia RTX PRO 6000D on Sept. 14, 2026.