Flightcontrol vs Heroku
Heroku gives you a great developer experience but it can get expensive as you scale. Flightcontrol gives you the PaaS experience but on top of your AWS account, so you have more control over the underlying infra and its costs.
What's good about...
Flightcontrol
- Your AWS infrastructure is managed by a seasoned devops team at a fraction of the cost
- Excellent documentation and easy-to-use dashboard
- Great developer experience: preview environments, rollbacks, notifications, monitoring
- Deploy close to your users, supports 28 AWS regions
Heroku
- As easy as it gets if you just want to deploy a Git repo
- Fully-managed infra, minimal ops overhead
- Heroku Postgres is a one-click, battle-tested database
- Extensive add-on marketplace
Price comparison
How do Flightcontrol's prices compare against Heroku?
| Example configuration |
Flightcontrol
|
Heroku
|
|---|---|---|
| VM Small | -- | $50.00 / mo Dyno 1 GB RAM (Standard 2X) |
| VM Medium | -- | $250.00 / mo Dyno 2.5 GB RAM (Performance M) |
| VM Large | -- | $500.00 / mo Dyno 14 GB RAM (Performance L) |
| Load Balancer | -- | Included in plan |
| Managed PostgreSQL | -- | $50.00 / mo 4 GB RAM, 64 GB storage |
| Managed Redis®* | -- | $200.00 / mo 1 GB RAM |
| Free egress allowance | -- | 2 TB / mo per app |
| 1 TB of egress beyond allowance | -- | Not publicly listed |
Flightcontrol charges a fixed monthly fee to use their service in addition to the standard AWS usage costs. They claim this model gives you up to 75% lower costs at scale when compared to traditional PaaS offerings.
There are currently 4 plans available:
- Free: limited to 1 user, but commercial use is allowed.
- Starter $49/mo: includes 5 services and multiple users.
- Business $249/mo: includes 10 services, preview environments, RBAC and multi-region.
- Enterprise: custom pricing, SLAs, premium support.
Additional services cost $15-30/mo, depending on the plan.
Note: Our pricing examples are based on several assumptions. Your actual costs may differ. Always check the cloud provider's website for the most up-to-date pricing.
Which services do they offer?
Here are some of the managed services that Flightcontrol and Heroku offer:
| Service |
Flightcontrol
|
Heroku
|
|---|---|---|
| Block Storage | -- | |
| Content Delivery Network (CDN) | -- | |
| Container Registry | -- | |
| GPU-powered Servers | -- | |
| Load Balancer | -- | |
| Managed Containers | ||
| Managed MySQL | -- | |
| Managed PostgreSQL | ||
| Managed Redis®* | ||
| Object Storage | -- | |
| Serverless Cron Jobs | -- | |
| Static Sites | -- | |
| Virtual Private Server (VPS) | -- |
Company details
|
Flightcontrol
|
Heroku
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Website | flightcontrol.dev | heroku.com |
| Headquarters | United States of America 🇺🇸 | United States of America 🇺🇸 |
| Founded | 2021 | 2007 |
| Data Center Locations | -- | 10 |
| Example Customers | Cal.com, Remi, Cascade PBS, Drive, Productlane | Airbase, Dovetail, Hotel Engine, ClickMechanic, Ambassify |
|
Flightcontrol
|
|
|---|---|
| Website | flightcontrol.dev |
| Headquarters | United States of America 🇺🇸 |
| Founded | 2021 |
| Data Center Locations | -- |
| Example Customers | Cal.com, Remi, Cascade PBS, Drive, Productlane |
|
Heroku
|
|
|---|---|
| Website | heroku.com |
| Headquarters | United States of America 🇺🇸 |
| Founded | 2007 |
| Data Center Locations | 10 |
| Example Customers | Airbase, Dovetail, Hotel Engine, ClickMechanic, Ambassify |
Alternatives to consider
Want to see how Flightcontrol and Heroku compare against other providers? Check out these other comparisons:
More comparisons
Our data for Flightcontrol was last updated on Aug. 16, 2024, and for Heroku on Aug. 15, 2024.