Two Nvidia workstation GPUs, one Ada Lovelace and one Turing: 16 GB GDDR6 against 24 GB GDDR6, 3x the memory bandwidth on the Quadro RTX 6000, and NVLink 100 GB/s on the Quadro RTX 6000 where the RTX 2000 Ada is PCIe only.
At a glance
Memory
- RTX 2000 Ada
- 16 GB
- Quadro RTX 6000
- 24 GB
1.5x more on Quadro RTX 6000
Memory bandwidth
- RTX 2000 Ada
- 224 GB/s
- Quadro RTX 6000
- 672 GB/s
3x higher on Quadro RTX 6000
Cheapest on-demand
- RTX 2000 Ada
- $0.12 /GPU/hr
- Quadro RTX 6000
- $0.13 /GPU/hr
13% cheaper on RTX 2000 Ada
Price comparison
Median price per GPU per hour by billing type, with the cheapest listing under it.
| Billing | RTX 2000 Ada | Quadro RTX 6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| On-demand | $0.24 /GPU/hr from $0.12 | -- /GPU/hr from $0.13 | |
| Reserved | On request | -- /GPU/hr from $0.12 (12 mo) |
Heads up: A provider's own page may quote a different figure, for example on tax, region or a promotion. A monthly-only plan shows a derived hourly rate. Medians are across providers, one vote each, so a large catalog does not outweigh a small one. No median for on-demand and reserved on the Quadro RTX 6000: we only show one when at least 3 providers list the GPU on that billing type. Verify before provisioning. More on how we price.
Price history
RTX 2000 Ada vs Quadro RTX 6000 price history
Weekly median on-demand price per GPU per hour
Specs comparison
| Spec | RTX 2000 Ada | Quadro RTX 6000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory | |||
| Capacity | 16 GB GDDR6 | 24 GB GDDR6 | 1.5x more on Quadro RTX 6000 |
| Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | 672 GB/s | 3x higher on Quadro RTX 6000 |
| Bus width | 128-bit | 384-bit | 3x wider on Quadro RTX 6000 |
| Compute · dense | |||
| FP8 | 96.0 TFLOPS | Not supported | RTX 2000 Ada only |
| FP16 / BF16 | 48.0 TFLOPS | 130.5 TFLOPS | 2.7x higher on Quadro RTX 6000 |
| INT8 | 261 TOPS | ||
| FP32 | 12 TFLOPS | 16.3 TFLOPS | 1.4x higher on Quadro RTX 6000 |
| Platform | |||
| Interconnect | PCIe only | NVLink 100 GB/s | NVLink on Quadro RTX 6000 only |
| Board power | 70 W | 295 W | 4.2x higher on Quadro RTX 6000 |
| Released | Q2 2024 | Q3 2018 | 6 years newer on RTX 2000 Ada |
| Precision | |||
| Supported formats | FP8FP16BF16TF32FP32INT4INT8 | FP16FP32INT4INT8 | |
Compute: Vendor peak figures, dense and per GPU. Not measured throughput.
Source: RTX 2000 Ada datasheet and Quadro RTX 6000 datasheet.
Where to rent them
Providers listing these GPUs, those with both first, so you can switch without moving clouds.
| Provider | RTX 2000 Ada /GPU/hr | Quadro RTX 6000 /GPU/hr |
|---|---|---|
Theta EdgeCloud
|
On-Demand $0.12 | -- |
GPU.ai
|
On-Demand $0.24 | -- |
Runpod
|
On-Demand $0.24 | -- |
Vast.ai
|
-- | On-Demand $0.13 |
Akamai Cloud
|
-- | On-Demand $1.50 |
Lambda Labs
|
-- | On-Demand $0.69 |
Similar GPUs
Other comparisons in the same class.
-
Nvidia RTX 4000 Ada
From $0.28 /GPU/hr Compare -
Nvidia RTX A2000
From $0.05 /GPU/hr Compare -
Nvidia RTX 6000 Ada
From $0.60 /GPU/hr Compare -
Nvidia RTX A6000
From $0.35 /GPU/hr Compare
Our data for Nvidia RTX 2000 Ada was last updated on Sept. 14, 2026, and for Nvidia Quadro RTX 6000 on Sept. 14, 2026.