The GH200 has 4x the memory and 6x the bandwidth. The RTX PRO 4000 is newer and cheaper right now.
At a glance
Memory
4x more on GH200
- GH200
- 96 GB
- RTX PRO 4000
- 24 GB
Memory bandwidth
6x higher on GH200
- GH200
- 4,000 GB/s
- RTX PRO 4000
- 672 GB/s
Cheapest on-demand
95% cheaper on RTX PRO 4000
- GH200
- $3.87 /GPU/hr
- RTX PRO 4000
- $0.20 /GPU/hr
Price comparison
Median price per GPU per hour by billing type, with the cheapest listing under it.
| Billing | GH200 | RTX PRO 4000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| On-demand | -- /GPU/hr from $3.87 | -- /GPU/hr from $0.20 | |
| Reserved | No reserved listings | -- /GPU/hr from $0.24 (1 mo) | |
| Spot | Sold out | -- /GPU/hr from $0.14 |
Heads up: A provider's own page may quote a different figure, for example on tax, region or a promotion. A monthly-only plan shows a derived hourly rate. Medians are across providers, one vote each, so a large catalog does not outweigh a small one. No median for on-demand on the GH200 and on-demand, reserved and spot on the RTX PRO 4000: we only show one when at least 3 providers list the GPU on that billing type. Verify before provisioning. More on how we price.
Price history
GH200 vs RTX PRO 4000 price history
Weekly median on-demand price per GPU per hour
Specs comparison
| Spec | GH200 | RTX PRO 4000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory | |||
| Capacity | 96 GB HBM3 | 24 GB GDDR7 | 4x more on GH200 |
| Bandwidth | 4,000 GB/s | 672 GB/s | 6x higher on GH200 |
| Bus width | 192-bit | ||
| Compute · dense | |||
| FP4 | Not supported | 589 TFLOPS | RTX PRO 4000 only |
| FP8 | 1,979 TFLOPS | 294.5 TFLOPS | 6.7x higher on GH200 |
| FP16 / BF16 | 989.5 TFLOPS | 147.3 TFLOPS | 6.7x higher on GH200 |
| INT8 | 1,979 TOPS | 294.5 TOPS | 6.7x higher on GH200 |
| FP32 | 67 TFLOPS | 37 TFLOPS | 81% higher on GH200 |
| FP64 | 34 TFLOPS | Not supported | GH200 only |
| Platform | |||
| Interconnect | NVLink 900 GB/s | PCIe only | NVLink on GH200 only |
| Released | Q2 2023 | Q1 2025 | 2 years newer on RTX PRO 4000 |
| Precision | |||
| Supported formats | FP8FP16BF16TF32FP32FP64INT8 | FP4FP8FP16BF16TF32FP32INT8 | |
Compute: Vendor peak figures, dense and per GPU. Not measured throughput.
Source: GH200 datasheet and RTX PRO 4000 datasheet.
Where to rent them
Providers that rent these GPUs, with each one's cheapest rate. No provider we track offers both right now.
| Provider | GH200 | RTX PRO 4000 |
|---|---|---|
Denvr
Canada
|
$3.87 /GPU/hr On-demand | -- |
CoreWeave
USA
|
$6.50 /GPU/hr On-demand | -- |
Lambda Labs
USA
|
$2.29 /GPU/hr On-demand | -- |
Sesterce
France
|
$2.52 /GPU/hr On-demand | -- |
Vultr
USA
|
$1.99 /GPU/hr Spot | -- |
Vast.ai
USA
|
-- | $0.20 /GPU/hr On-demand |
Database Mart
USA
|
-- | $0.26 /GPU/hr Reserved |
Runpod
USA
|
-- | On request Reserved |
Similar GPUs
Other comparisons in the same class.
-
Nvidia H100
80 GB HBM3 · 16% less bandwidth than the GH200
From $1.73 /GPU/hr Compare -
Nvidia H200
141 GB HBM3e · 20% more bandwidth than the GH200
From $2.09 /GPU/hr Compare
-
AMD MI300X
192 GB HBM3 · 32% more bandwidth than the GH200
From $2.59 /GPU/hr Compare -
Nvidia A4000
16 GB GDDR6 · 33% less bandwidth than the RTX PRO 4000
From $0.07 /GPU/hr Compare
Our data for Nvidia GH200 was last updated on Sept. 14, 2026, and for Nvidia RTX PRO 4000 on Sept. 14, 2026.