The RTX 5090 is newer, with 2.7x the memory and 6.2x the bandwidth. The RTX A2000 is cheaper right now.
At a glance
Memory
2.7x more on RTX 5090
- RTX A2000
- 12 GB
- RTX 5090
- 32 GB
Memory bandwidth
6.2x higher on RTX 5090
- RTX A2000
- 288 GB/s
- RTX 5090
- 1,792 GB/s
Cheapest on-demand
68% cheaper on RTX A2000
- RTX A2000
- $0.11 /GPU/hr
- RTX 5090
- $0.35 /GPU/hr
Price comparison
Median price per GPU per hour by billing type, with the cheapest listing under it.
| Billing | RTX A2000 | RTX 5090 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| On-demand | -- /GPU/hr from $0.11 | $0.69 /GPU/hr from $0.35 | |
| Reserved | -- /GPU/hr from $1.20 (1 mo) | $0.59 /GPU/hr from $0.21 (1 mo) | |
| Spot | -- /GPU/hr from $0.05 | $0.48 /GPU/hr from $0.25 |
Heads up: A provider's own page may quote a different figure, for example on tax, region or a promotion. A monthly-only plan shows a derived hourly rate. Medians are across providers, one vote each, so a large catalog does not outweigh a small one. No median for on-demand, reserved and spot on the RTX A2000: we only show one when at least 3 providers list the GPU on that billing type. Verify before provisioning. More on how we price.
Price history
RTX A2000 vs RTX 5090 price history
Weekly median on-demand price per GPU per hour
Specs comparison
| Spec | RTX A2000 | RTX 5090 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory | |||
| Capacity | 12 GB GDDR6 | 32 GB GDDR7 | 2.7x more on RTX 5090 |
| Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 1,792 GB/s | 6.2x higher on RTX 5090 |
| Bus width | 192-bit | 512-bit | 2.7x wider on RTX 5090 |
| Compute · dense | |||
| FP4 | Not supported | 1,676 TFLOPS | RTX 5090 only |
| FP8 | Not supported | 419 TFLOPS | RTX 5090 only |
| FP16 / BF16 | 31.9 TFLOPS | 209.5 TFLOPS | 6.6x higher on RTX 5090 |
| INT8 | 838 TOPS | ||
| FP32 | 8 TFLOPS | 104.8 TFLOPS | 13x higher on RTX 5090 |
| Platform | |||
| Interconnect | PCIe only | PCIe only | |
| Board power | 70 W | 575 W | 8.2x higher on RTX 5090 |
| Released | Q3 2021 | Q1 2025 | 4 years newer on RTX 5090 |
| Precision | |||
| Supported formats | FP16BF16TF32FP32INT4INT8 | FP4FP8FP16BF16TF32FP32INT8 | |
Figures are for each model's headline configuration. Where a form factor carries a different number, it is named under the figure.
Compute: Vendor peak figures, dense and per GPU. Not measured throughput.
Source: RTX A2000 datasheet and RTX 5090 datasheet.
Where to rent them
Providers that rent these GPUs, with each one's cheapest rate. Providers that rent both are listed first.
| Provider | RTX A2000 | RTX 5090 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
$0.11 /GPU/hr On-demand | $0.43 /GPU/hr On-demand |
|
|
$0.12 /GPU/hr On-demand | $0.69 /GPU/hr On-demand |
|
|
-- | $0.35 /GPU/hr On-demand |
|
|
-- | $0.41 /GPU/hr On-demand |
|
|
-- | $0.46 /GPU/hr On-demand |
|
|
-- | $0.65 /GPU/hr On-demand |
|
|
-- | $0.66 /GPU/hr On-demand PCIe |
|
|
-- | $0.71 /GPU/hr On-demand |
2 providers list the RTX A2000 and 23 the RTX 5090. Every listing is on the RTX A2000 page and the RTX 5090 page.
Similar GPUs
Other comparisons in the same class.
-
Nvidia L4
24 GB GDDR6 · data center card
From $0.32 /GPU/hr Compare -
Nvidia T4
16 GB GDDR6 · data center card
From $0.15 /GPU/hr Compare -
Nvidia A4000
16 GB GDDR6 · 56% more bandwidth than the RTX A2000
From $0.07 /GPU/hr Compare -
Nvidia RTX PRO 6000
96 GB GDDR7 · workstation card
From $0.65 /GPU/hr Compare -
Nvidia RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X · 44% less bandwidth than the RTX 5090
From $0.33 /GPU/hr Compare
Our data for Nvidia RTX A2000 was last updated on Sept. 14, 2026, and for Nvidia RTX 5090 on Sept. 14, 2026.