AMD MI300X
vs
Nvidia GTX 1650
The MI300X is newer, with 48x the memory and 41x the bandwidth. The GTX 1650 is cheaper right now.
At a glance
Memory
48x more on MI300X
- MI300X
- 192 GB
- GTX 1650
- 4 GB
Memory bandwidth
41x higher on MI300X
- MI300X
- 5,300 GB/s
- GTX 1650
- 128 GB/s
Cheapest on-demand
99% cheaper on GTX 1650
- MI300X
- $2.59 /GPU/hr
- GTX 1650
- $0.02 /GPU/hr
Price comparison
Median price per GPU per hour by billing type, with the cheapest listing under it.
| Billing | MI300X | GTX 1650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| On-demand | $4.41 /GPU/hr from $2.59 | -- /GPU/hr from $0.02 | |
| Reserved | $3.39 /GPU/hr from $1.61 (12 mo) | -- /GPU/hr from $0.09 (24 mo) | |
| Spot | -- /GPU/hr from $1.60 | -- /GPU/hr from $0.01 |
Heads up: A provider's own page may quote a different figure, for example on tax, region or a promotion. A monthly-only plan shows a derived hourly rate. Medians are across providers, one vote each, so a large catalog does not outweigh a small one. No median for spot on the MI300X and on-demand, reserved and spot on the GTX 1650: we only show one when at least 3 providers list the GPU on that billing type. Verify before provisioning. More on how we price.
Price history
MI300X vs GTX 1650 price history
Weekly median on-demand price per GPU per hour
Specs comparison
| Spec | MI300X | GTX 1650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory | |||
| Capacity | 192 GB HBM3 | 4 GB GDDR5 | 48x more on MI300X |
| Bandwidth | 5,300 GB/s | 128 GB/s | 41x higher on MI300X |
| Bus width | 8,192-bit | 128-bit | 64x wider on MI300X |
| Compute · dense | |||
| FP8 | 2,614.9 TFLOPS | Not supported | MI300X only |
| FP16 / BF16 | 1,307.4 TFLOPS | 6.0 TFLOPS | 219x higher on MI300X |
| INT8 | 2,614.9 TOPS | Not supported | MI300X only |
| FP32 | 163.4 TFLOPS | 3.0 TFLOPS | 55x higher on MI300X |
| FP64 | 81.7 TFLOPS | Not supported | MI300X only |
| Platform | |||
| Interconnect | Infinity Fabric 896 GB/s | PCIe only | Infinity Fabric on MI300X only |
| Board power | 750 W | 75 W | 10x higher on MI300X |
| Released | Q4 2023 | Q2 2019 | 5 years newer on MI300X |
| Precision | |||
| Supported formats | FP8FP16BF16TF32FP32FP64INT8 | FP16FP32 | |
Compute: Vendor peak figures, dense and per GPU. Not measured throughput.
Source: MI300X datasheet and GTX 1650 datasheet.
Where to rent them
Providers that rent these GPUs, with each one's cheapest rate. No provider we track offers both right now.
| Provider | MI300X | GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
$3.39 /GPU/hr Reserved | -- |
|
|
On request Custom | -- |
|
|
$2.59 /GPU/hr On-demand | -- |
|
|
$2.76 /GPU/hr On-demand | -- |
|
|
$6.00 /GPU/hr On-demand | -- |
|
|
$7.86 /GPU/hr On-demand | -- |
|
|
$3.12 /GPU/hr Reserved | -- |
|
|
On request Reserved | -- |
|
|
-- | $0.68 /GPU/hr On-demand |
|
|
-- | $0.0200 /GPU/hr On-demand |
|
|
-- | $0.09 /GPU/hr Reserved |
11 providers list the MI300X and 3 the GTX 1650. Every listing is on the MI300X page and the GTX 1650 page.
Similar GPUs
Other comparisons in the same class.
-
Nvidia H100
80 GB HBM3 · 37% less bandwidth than the MI300X
From $1.60 /GPU/hr Compare -
Nvidia A100
80 GB HBM2e · 63% less bandwidth than the MI300X
From $0.40 /GPU/hr Compare -
AMD MI325X
256 GB HBM3e · released Q4 2024
From $2.25 /GPU/hr Compare -
Nvidia RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 · 2.8x the bandwidth of the GTX 1650
From $0.05 /GPU/hr Compare -
Nvidia RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 · 75% more bandwidth than the GTX 1650
From $0.07 /GPU/hr Compare
Our data for AMD MI300X was last updated on Sept. 14, 2026, and for Nvidia GTX 1650 on Sept. 14, 2026.