Fluidstack
vs
Runcrate
Both aggregate GPU capacity for AI. Fluidstack contracts large training clusters and publishes no rates, while Runcrate rents A10 to H100 instances self-serve per second with no minimum and an inference API.
What's good about each
- Managed Slurm and Kubernetes clusters on bare metal
- Active and passive cluster health checks with observability
- ClusterMAX Gold rating from SemiAnalysis
- Custom data centers built for a single customer's workload
- Per-second GPU billing with no minimum commitment
- Eight global regions across North America, Europe, and Asia
- Full root access with SSH, Docker, and custom images
- OpenAI-compatible inference API for open-source models
GPUs
Runcrate offers 15 GPU models. We don't currently list GPU prices for Fluidstack.
Services
Managed services each provider offers.
| Service | Fluidstack | Runcrate |
|---|---|---|
| GPU-powered Servers |
Company details
| Fact | Fluidstack | Runcrate |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2017 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | USA | USA |
| Locations | 4 | -- |
| Example customers | -- | -- |
| Website | www.fluidstack.io | www.runcrate.ai |
Alternatives to consider
Compare Fluidstack and Runcrate against other cloud providers.
Our data for Fluidstack was last updated on Sept. 18, 2026, and for Runcrate on Oct. 22, 2026.