The RTX PRO 4000 SFF is newer, with 6x the memory and 3.4x the bandwidth. The GTX 1650 is cheaper right now.
At a glance
Memory
6x more on RTX PRO 4000 SFF
- GTX 1650
- 4 GB
- RTX PRO 4000 SFF
- 24 GB
Memory bandwidth
3.4x higher on RTX PRO 4000 SFF
- GTX 1650
- 128 GB/s
- RTX PRO 4000 SFF
- 432 GB/s
Cheapest on-demand
95% cheaper on GTX 1650
- GTX 1650
- $0.02 /GPU/hr
- RTX PRO 4000 SFF
- $0.38 /GPU/hr
Price comparison
Median price per GPU per hour by billing type, with the cheapest listing under it.
| Billing | GTX 1650 | RTX PRO 4000 SFF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| On-demand | -- /GPU/hr from $0.02 | -- /GPU/hr from $0.38 | |
| Reserved | -- /GPU/hr from $0.14 (24 mo) | No reserved listings | |
| Spot | -- /GPU/hr from $0.01 | No spot listings |
Heads up: A provider's own page may quote a different figure, for example on tax, region or a promotion. A monthly-only plan shows a derived hourly rate. Medians are across providers, one vote each, so a large catalog does not outweigh a small one. No median for on-demand, reserved and spot on the GTX 1650 and on-demand on the RTX PRO 4000 SFF: we only show one when at least 3 providers list the GPU on that billing type. Verify before provisioning. More on how we price.
Price history
GTX 1650 vs RTX PRO 4000 SFF price history
Weekly median on-demand price per GPU per hour
Specs comparison
| Spec | GTX 1650 | RTX PRO 4000 SFF | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory | |||
| Capacity | 4 GB GDDR5 | 24 GB GDDR7 | 6x more on RTX PRO 4000 SFF |
| Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 432 GB/s | 3.4x higher on RTX PRO 4000 SFF |
| Bus width | 128-bit | 192-bit | 50% wider on RTX PRO 4000 SFF |
| Compute · dense | |||
| FP4 | Not supported | 385 TFLOPS | RTX PRO 4000 SFF only |
| FP8 | Not supported | 192.5 TFLOPS | RTX PRO 4000 SFF only |
| FP16 / BF16 | 6.0 TFLOPS | 96.3 TFLOPS | 16x higher on RTX PRO 4000 SFF |
| INT8 | Not supported | 192.5 TOPS | RTX PRO 4000 SFF only |
| FP32 | 3.0 TFLOPS | 24 TFLOPS | 8.1x higher on RTX PRO 4000 SFF |
| Platform | |||
| Interconnect | PCIe only | PCIe only | |
| Board power | 75 W | 70 W | 7% higher on GTX 1650 |
| Released | Q2 2019 | Q3 2025 | 6 years newer on RTX PRO 4000 SFF |
| Precision | |||
| Supported formats | FP16FP32 | FP4FP8FP16BF16TF32FP32INT8 | |
Compute: Vendor peak figures, dense and per GPU. Not measured throughput.
Source: GTX 1650 datasheet and RTX PRO 4000 SFF datasheet.
Where to rent them
Providers that rent these GPUs, with each one's cheapest rate. No provider we track offers both right now.
| Provider | GTX 1650 | RTX PRO 4000 SFF |
|---|---|---|
Salad
Distributed
|
$0.0200 /GPU/hr On-demand | -- |
Database Mart
USA
|
$0.14 /GPU/hr Reserved | -- |
Hetzner
Germany
|
-- | $0.38 /GPU/hr On-demand |
Similar GPUs
Other comparisons in the same class.
-
Nvidia RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 · 2.8x the bandwidth of the GTX 1650
On-demand from $0.07 /GPU/hr -
Nvidia RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 · 75% more bandwidth than the GTX 1650
On-demand from $0.07 /GPU/hr
-
Nvidia GTX 1660
6 GB GDDR5 · 50% more bandwidth than the GTX 1650
On-demand from $0.04 /GPU/hr
-
Nvidia RTX PRO 4000
24 GB GDDR7 · 56% more bandwidth than the RTX PRO 4000 SFF
On-demand from $0.27 /GPU/hr
Our data for Nvidia GTX 1650 was last updated on Sept. 14, 2026, and for Nvidia RTX PRO 4000 SFF on Nov. 9, 2026.