The RTX PRO 4000 is newer, with 6x the memory and 5.2x the bandwidth. The GTX 1650 is cheaper right now.
At a glance
Memory
6x more on RTX PRO 4000
- GTX 1650
- 4 GB
- RTX PRO 4000
- 24 GB
Memory bandwidth
5.2x higher on RTX PRO 4000
- GTX 1650
- 128 GB/s
- RTX PRO 4000
- 672 GB/s
Cheapest on-demand
90% cheaper on GTX 1650
- GTX 1650
- $0.02 /GPU/hr
- RTX PRO 4000
- $0.20 /GPU/hr
Price comparison
Median price per GPU per hour by billing type, with the cheapest listing under it.
| Billing | GTX 1650 | RTX PRO 4000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| On-demand | -- /GPU/hr from $0.02 | -- /GPU/hr from $0.20 | |
| Reserved | -- /GPU/hr from $0.09 (24 mo) | -- /GPU/hr from $0.24 (1 mo) | |
| Spot | -- /GPU/hr from $0.01 | -- /GPU/hr from $0.14 |
Heads up: A provider's own page may quote a different figure, for example on tax, region or a promotion. A monthly-only plan shows a derived hourly rate. Medians are across providers, one vote each, so a large catalog does not outweigh a small one. No median for on-demand, reserved and spot on the GTX 1650 and on-demand, reserved and spot on the RTX PRO 4000: we only show one when at least 3 providers list the GPU on that billing type. Verify before provisioning. More on how we price.
Price history
GTX 1650 vs RTX PRO 4000 price history
Weekly median on-demand price per GPU per hour
Specs comparison
| Spec | GTX 1650 | RTX PRO 4000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory | |||
| Capacity | 4 GB GDDR5 | 24 GB GDDR7 | 6x more on RTX PRO 4000 |
| Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 672 GB/s | 5.2x higher on RTX PRO 4000 |
| Bus width | 128-bit | 192-bit | 50% wider on RTX PRO 4000 |
| Compute · dense | |||
| FP4 | Not supported | 589 TFLOPS | RTX PRO 4000 only |
| FP8 | Not supported | 294.5 TFLOPS | RTX PRO 4000 only |
| FP16 / BF16 | 6.0 TFLOPS | 147.3 TFLOPS | 25x higher on RTX PRO 4000 |
| INT8 | Not supported | 294.5 TOPS | RTX PRO 4000 only |
| FP32 | 3.0 TFLOPS | 37 TFLOPS | 12x higher on RTX PRO 4000 |
| Platform | |||
| Interconnect | PCIe only | PCIe only | |
| Board power | 75 W | 145 W | 93% higher on RTX PRO 4000 |
| Released | Q2 2019 | Q1 2025 | 6 years newer on RTX PRO 4000 |
| Precision | |||
| Supported formats | FP16FP32 | FP4FP8FP16BF16TF32FP32INT8 | |
Compute: Vendor peak figures, dense and per GPU. Not measured throughput.
Source: GTX 1650 datasheet and RTX PRO 4000 datasheet.
Where to rent them
Providers that rent these GPUs, with each one's cheapest rate. Providers that rent both are listed first.
| Provider | GTX 1650 | RTX PRO 4000 |
|---|---|---|
Vast.ai
USA
|
$0.0474 /GPU/hr On-demand | $0.20 /GPU/hr On-demand |
Database Mart
USA
|
$0.09 /GPU/hr Reserved | $0.26 /GPU/hr Reserved |
Salad
Distributed
|
$0.0200 /GPU/hr On-demand | -- |
Runpod
USA
|
-- | On request Reserved |
Similar GPUs
Other comparisons in the same class.
-
Nvidia RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 · 2.8x the bandwidth of the GTX 1650
From $0.06 /GPU/hr Compare -
Nvidia RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 · 75% more bandwidth than the GTX 1650
From $0.07 /GPU/hr Compare
-
Nvidia GTX 1660
6 GB GDDR5 · 50% more bandwidth than the GTX 1650
From $0.04 /GPU/hr Compare
-
Nvidia A4000
16 GB GDDR6 · 33% less bandwidth than the RTX PRO 4000
From $0.07 /GPU/hr Compare
Our data for Nvidia GTX 1650 was last updated on Sept. 14, 2026, and for Nvidia RTX PRO 4000 on Sept. 14, 2026.