A consumer GPU against a workstation card, one Turing and one Ada Lovelace: 4 GB GDDR5 against 16 GB GDDR6 and 75% more memory bandwidth on the RTX 2000 Ada.
At a glance
Memory
- GTX 1650
- 4 GB
- RTX 2000 Ada
- 16 GB
4x more on RTX 2000 Ada
Memory bandwidth
- GTX 1650
- 128 GB/s
- RTX 2000 Ada
- 224 GB/s
1.8x higher on RTX 2000 Ada
Cheapest on-demand
- GTX 1650
- $0.02 /GPU/hr
- RTX 2000 Ada
- $0.13 /GPU/hr
6.5x more expensive on RTX 2000 Ada
Price comparison
Median price per GPU per hour by billing type, with the cheapest listing under it.
| Billing | GTX 1650 | RTX 2000 Ada | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| On-demand | -- /GPU/hr from $0.02 | -- /GPU/hr from $0.13 | |
| Reserved | -- /GPU/hr from $0.14 (24 mo) | On request | |
| Spot | -- /GPU/hr from $0.01 | No spot listings |
Heads up: A provider's own page may quote a different figure, for example on tax, region or a promotion. A monthly-only plan shows a derived hourly rate. Medians are across providers, one vote each, so a large catalog does not outweigh a small one. No median for on-demand, reserved and spot on the GTX 1650 and on-demand on the RTX 2000 Ada: we only show one when at least 3 providers list the GPU on that billing type. Verify before provisioning. More on how we price.
Price history
GTX 1650 vs RTX 2000 Ada price history
Weekly median on-demand price per GPU per hour
Specs comparison
| Spec | GTX 1650 | RTX 2000 Ada | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory | |||
| Capacity | 4 GB GDDR5 | 16 GB GDDR6 | 4x more on RTX 2000 Ada |
| Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 224 GB/s | 1.8x higher on RTX 2000 Ada |
| Bus width | 128-bit | 128-bit | Identical |
| Compute · dense | |||
| FP8 | Not supported | 96.0 TFLOPS | RTX 2000 Ada only |
| FP16 / BF16 | 6.0 TFLOPS | 48.0 TFLOPS | 8x higher on RTX 2000 Ada |
| FP32 | 3.0 TFLOPS | 12 TFLOPS | 4x higher on RTX 2000 Ada |
| Platform | |||
| Interconnect | PCIe only | PCIe only | |
| Board power | 75 W | 70 W | 1.1x higher on GTX 1650 |
| Released | Q2 2019 | Q2 2024 | 5 years newer on RTX 2000 Ada |
| Precision | |||
| Supported formats | FP16FP32 | FP8FP16BF16TF32FP32INT4INT8 | |
Compute: Vendor peak figures, dense and per GPU. Not measured throughput.
Source: GTX 1650 datasheet and RTX 2000 Ada datasheet.
Where to rent them
Providers listing these GPUs, those with both first, so you can switch without moving clouds.
| Provider | GTX 1650 /GPU/hr | RTX 2000 Ada /GPU/hr |
|---|---|---|
Salad
|
On-Demand $0.0200 | -- |
Vast.ai
|
On-Demand $0.0471 | -- |
Database Mart
|
Reserved (24mo) $0.14 | -- |
Theta EdgeCloud
|
-- | On-Demand $0.13 |
GPU.ai
|
-- | On-Demand $0.24 |
Runpod
|
-- | Reservation on request |
Similar GPUs
Other comparisons in the same class.
-
Nvidia RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 · 2.8x the bandwidth of the GTX 1650
From $0.04 /GPU/hr Compare -
Nvidia RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 · 75% more bandwidth than the GTX 1650
From $0.07 /GPU/hr Compare
-
Nvidia GTX 1660
6 GB GDDR5 · 50% more bandwidth than the GTX 1650
From $0.04 /GPU/hr Compare
-
Nvidia L4
24 GB GDDR6 · 34% more bandwidth than the RTX 2000 Ada
From $0.31 /GPU/hr Compare
Our data for Nvidia GTX 1650 was last updated on Sept. 14, 2026, and for Nvidia RTX 2000 Ada on Sept. 14, 2026.