The H200 is newer, with 35x the memory and 38x the bandwidth. The GTX 1650 is cheaper right now.
At a glance
Memory
35x more on H200
- GTX 1650
- 4 GB
- H200
- 141 GB
Memory bandwidth
38x higher on H200
- GTX 1650
- 128 GB/s
- H200
- 4,800 GB/s
Cheapest on-demand
99% cheaper on GTX 1650
- GTX 1650
- $0.02 /GPU/hr
- H200
- $2.09 /GPU/hr
Price comparison
Median price per GPU per hour by billing type, with the cheapest listing under it.
| Billing | GTX 1650 | H200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| On-demand | -- /GPU/hr from $0.02 | $4.38 /GPU/hr from $2.09 | |
| Reserved | -- /GPU/hr from $0.09 (24 mo) | $4.00 /GPU/hr from $2.23 (1 mo) | |
| Spot | -- /GPU/hr from $0.01 | $2.62 /GPU/hr from $0.47 |
Heads up: A provider's own page may quote a different figure, for example on tax, region or a promotion. A monthly-only plan shows a derived hourly rate. Medians are across providers, one vote each, so a large catalog does not outweigh a small one. No median for on-demand, reserved and spot on the GTX 1650: we only show one when at least 3 providers list the GPU on that billing type. Verify before provisioning. More on how we price.
Price history
GTX 1650 vs H200 price history
Weekly median on-demand price per GPU per hour
Specs comparison
| Spec | GTX 1650 | H200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory | |||
| Capacity | 4 GB GDDR5 | 141 GB HBM3e | 35x more on H200 |
| Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 4,800 GB/s | 38x higher on H200 |
| Bus width | 128-bit | ||
| Compute · dense | |||
| FP8 | Not supported | 1,979 TFLOPS | H200 only |
| FP16 / BF16 | 6.0 TFLOPS | 989.5 TFLOPS | 166x higher on H200 |
| INT8 | Not supported | 1,979 TOPS | H200 only |
| FP32 | 3.0 TFLOPS | 67 TFLOPS | 22x higher on H200 |
| FP64 | Not supported | 34 TFLOPS | H200 only |
| Platform | |||
| Interconnect | PCIe only | NVLink 900 GB/s | NVLink on H200 only |
| Board power | 75 W | 700 W | 9.3x higher on H200 |
| Released | Q2 2019 | Q4 2023 | 5 years newer on H200 |
| Precision | |||
| Supported formats | FP16FP32 | FP8FP16BF16TF32FP32FP64INT8 | |
Compute: Vendor peak figures, dense and per GPU. Not measured throughput.
Source: GTX 1650 datasheet and H200 datasheet.
Where to rent them
Providers that rent these GPUs, with each one's cheapest rate. Providers that rent both are listed first.
| Provider | GTX 1650 | H200 |
|---|---|---|
Vast.ai
USA
|
$0.68 /GPU/hr On-demand | $2.57 /GPU/hr On-demand NVL |
Salad
Distributed
|
$0.0200 /GPU/hr On-demand | -- |
Database Mart
USA
|
$0.09 /GPU/hr Reserved | -- |
GPU.ai
UAE
|
-- | $2.58 /GPU/hr On-demand NVL |
Lium
Distributed
|
-- | $2.95 /GPU/hr On-demand SXM |
Runpod
USA
|
-- | $3.59 /GPU/hr On-demand SXM |
Massed Compute
USA
|
-- | $3.62 /GPU/hr On-demand NVL |
Hyperstack
UK
|
-- | $3.99 /GPU/hr On-demand SXM |
Jarvislabs
India
|
-- | $3.99 /GPU/hr On-demand SXM |
Runcrate
USA
|
-- | $4.24 /GPU/hr On-demand SXM |
3 providers list the GTX 1650 and 51 the H200. Every listing is on the GTX 1650 page and the H200 page.
Similar GPUs
Other comparisons in the same class.
-
Nvidia RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 · 2.8x the bandwidth of the GTX 1650
From $0.05 /GPU/hr Compare -
Nvidia RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 · 75% more bandwidth than the GTX 1650
From $0.07 /GPU/hr Compare
-
Nvidia GTX 1660
6 GB GDDR5 · 50% more bandwidth than the GTX 1650
From $0.04 /GPU/hr Compare
-
Nvidia H100
80 GB HBM3 · 30% less bandwidth than the H200
From $1.73 /GPU/hr Compare
-
Nvidia B200
180 GB HBM3e · 60% more bandwidth than the H200
From $3.75 /GPU/hr Compare
Our data for Nvidia GTX 1650 was last updated on Sept. 14, 2026, and for Nvidia H200 on Sept. 14, 2026.