A consumer GPU against a workstation card, one Pascal and one Ada Lovelace: 8 GB GDDR5 against 16 GB GDDR6 and 14% more memory bandwidth on the GTX 1070.
At a glance
Memory
- GTX 1070
- 8 GB
- RTX 2000 Ada
- 16 GB
2x more on RTX 2000 Ada
Memory bandwidth
- GTX 1070
- 256 GB/s
- RTX 2000 Ada
- 224 GB/s
1.1x higher on GTX 1070
Cheapest on-demand
- GTX 1070
- $0.04 /GPU/hr
- RTX 2000 Ada
- $0.13 /GPU/hr
3.2x more expensive on RTX 2000 Ada
Price comparison
Median price per GPU per hour by billing type, with the cheapest listing under it.
| Billing | GTX 1070 | RTX 2000 Ada | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| On-demand | $0.05 /GPU/hr from $0.04 | $0.24 /GPU/hr from $0.13 | 5x more expensive on RTX 2000 Ada |
| Reserved | No reserved listings | On request | |
| Spot | -- /GPU/hr from $0.02 | No spot listings |
Heads up: A provider's own page may quote a different figure, for example on tax, region or a promotion. A monthly-only plan shows a derived hourly rate. Medians are across providers, one vote each, so a large catalog does not outweigh a small one. No median for spot on the GTX 1070: we only show one when at least 3 providers list the GPU on that billing type. Verify before provisioning. More on how we price.
Price history
GTX 1070 vs RTX 2000 Ada price history
Weekly median on-demand price per GPU per hour
Specs comparison
| Spec | GTX 1070 | RTX 2000 Ada | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory | |||
| Capacity | 8 GB GDDR5 | 16 GB GDDR6 | 2x more on RTX 2000 Ada |
| Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 224 GB/s | 1.1x higher on GTX 1070 |
| Bus width | 256-bit | 128-bit | 2x wider on GTX 1070 |
| Compute · dense | |||
| FP8 | Not supported | 96.0 TFLOPS | RTX 2000 Ada only |
| FP16 / BF16 | 48.0 TFLOPS | ||
| FP32 | 6.5 TFLOPS | 12 TFLOPS | 1.9x higher on RTX 2000 Ada |
| Platform | |||
| Interconnect | PCIe only | PCIe only | |
| Board power | 150 W | 70 W | 2.1x higher on GTX 1070 |
| Released | Q2 2016 | Q2 2024 | 8 years newer on RTX 2000 Ada |
| Precision | |||
| Supported formats | FP16FP32 | FP8FP16BF16TF32FP32INT4INT8 | |
Compute: Vendor peak figures, dense and per GPU. Not measured throughput.
Source: GTX 1070 datasheet and RTX 2000 Ada datasheet.
Where to rent them
Providers listing these GPUs, those with both first, so you can switch without moving clouds.
| Provider | GTX 1070 /GPU/hr | RTX 2000 Ada /GPU/hr |
|---|---|---|
|
|
On-Demand $0.08 | On-Demand $0.13 |
|
|
On-Demand $0.0400 | -- |
|
|
On-Demand $0.0472 | -- |
|
|
-- | On-Demand $0.24 |
|
|
-- | On-Demand $0.24 |
Similar GPUs
Other comparisons in the same class.
-
Nvidia RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 · 41% more bandwidth than the GTX 1070
From $0.05 /GPU/hr Compare -
Nvidia RTX 2060
6 GB GDDR6 · 31% more bandwidth than the GTX 1070
From $0.05 /GPU/hr Compare -
Nvidia GTX 1080
8 GB GDDR5X · 25% more bandwidth than the GTX 1070
From $0.04 /GPU/hr Compare -
Nvidia L4
24 GB GDDR6 · 34% more bandwidth than the RTX 2000 Ada
From $0.32 /GPU/hr Compare
Our data for Nvidia GTX 1070 was last updated on Sept. 14, 2026, and for Nvidia RTX 2000 Ada on Sept. 14, 2026.