The B200 is newer, with 45x the memory and 60x the bandwidth. The GTX 1650 is cheaper right now.
At a glance
Memory
45x more on B200
- B200
- 180 GB
- GTX 1650
- 4 GB
Memory bandwidth
60x higher on B200
- B200
- 7,700 GB/s
- GTX 1650
- 128 GB/s
Cheapest on-demand
99% cheaper on GTX 1650
- B200
- $3.75 /GPU/hr
- GTX 1650
- $0.02 /GPU/hr
Price comparison
Median price per GPU per hour by billing type, with the cheapest listing under it.
| Billing | B200 | GTX 1650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| On-demand | $6.64 /GPU/hr from $3.75 | -- /GPU/hr from $0.02 | |
| Reserved | $5.62 /GPU/hr from $3.75 | -- /GPU/hr from $0.09 (24 mo) | |
| Spot | $4.26 /GPU/hr from $2.40 | -- /GPU/hr from $0.01 |
Heads up: A provider's own page may quote a different figure, for example on tax, region or a promotion. A monthly-only plan shows a derived hourly rate. Medians are across providers, one vote each, so a large catalog does not outweigh a small one. No median for on-demand, reserved and spot on the GTX 1650: we only show one when at least 3 providers list the GPU on that billing type. Verify before provisioning. More on how we price.
Price history
B200 vs GTX 1650 price history
Weekly median on-demand price per GPU per hour
Specs comparison
| Spec | B200 | GTX 1650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory | |||
| Capacity | 180 GB HBM3e | 4 GB GDDR5 | 45x more on B200 |
| Bandwidth | 7,700 GB/s | 128 GB/s | 60x higher on B200 |
| Bus width | 128-bit | ||
| Compute · dense | |||
| FP4 | 9,000 TFLOPS | Not supported | B200 only |
| FP8 | 4,500 TFLOPS | Not supported | B200 only |
| FP16 / BF16 | 2,250 TFLOPS | 6.0 TFLOPS | 377x higher on B200 |
| INT8 | 4,500 TOPS | Not supported | B200 only |
| FP32 | 75 TFLOPS | 3.0 TFLOPS | 25x higher on B200 |
| FP64 | 37 TFLOPS | Not supported | B200 only |
| Platform | |||
| Interconnect | NVLink 1,800 GB/s | PCIe only | NVLink on B200 only |
| Board power | 1,000 W | 75 W | 13x higher on B200 |
| Released | Q1 2024 | Q2 2019 | 5 years newer on B200 |
| Precision | |||
| Supported formats | FP4FP6FP8FP16BF16TF32FP32FP64INT8 | FP16FP32 | |
Compute: Vendor peak figures, dense and per GPU. Not measured throughput.
Source: B200 datasheet and GTX 1650 datasheet.
Where to rent them
Providers that rent these GPUs, with each one's cheapest rate. Providers that rent both are listed first.
| Provider | B200 | GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
Vast.ai
USA
|
$6.25 /GPU/hr On-demand | $0.68 /GPU/hr On-demand |
Packet·ai
USA
|
$3.75 /GPU/hr On-demand | -- |
Lium
Distributed
|
$5.40 /GPU/hr On-demand SXM | -- |
Lyceum
Germany
|
$6.49 /GPU/hr On-demand | -- |
GPU.ai
UAE
|
$6.79 /GPU/hr On-demand SXM | -- |
Runpod
USA
|
$6.79 /GPU/hr On-demand SXM | -- |
Verda
Finland
|
$6.99 /GPU/hr On-demand SXM | -- |
EmpirioLabs AI
USA
|
$10.80 /GPU/hr On-demand | -- |
Salad
Distributed
|
-- | $0.0200 /GPU/hr On-demand |
Database Mart
USA
|
-- | $0.09 /GPU/hr Reserved |
40 providers list the B200 and 3 the GTX 1650. Every listing is on the B200 page and the GTX 1650 page.
Similar GPUs
Other comparisons in the same class.
-
Nvidia H100
80 GB HBM3 · 56% less bandwidth than the B200
From $1.73 /GPU/hr Compare -
Nvidia B300
288 GB HBM3e · released Q1 2025
From $4.99 /GPU/hr Compare
-
Nvidia H200
141 GB HBM3e · 38% less bandwidth than the B200
From $2.09 /GPU/hr Compare
-
Nvidia RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 · 2.8x the bandwidth of the GTX 1650
From $0.05 /GPU/hr Compare
-
Nvidia RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 · 75% more bandwidth than the GTX 1650
From $0.07 /GPU/hr Compare
Our data for Nvidia B200 was last updated on Sept. 14, 2026, and for Nvidia GTX 1650 on Sept. 14, 2026.