The GB300 is newer, with 24x the memory and 28x the bandwidth. The RTX A2000 is cheaper right now.
At a glance
Memory
24x more on GB300
- RTX A2000
- 12 GB
- GB300
- 288 GB
Memory bandwidth
28x higher on GB300
- RTX A2000
- 288 GB/s
- GB300
- 8,000 GB/s
Cheapest on-demand
99% cheaper on RTX A2000
- RTX A2000
- $0.14 /GPU/hr
- GB300
- $18.00 /GPU/hr
Price comparison
Median price per GPU per hour by billing type, with the cheapest listing under it.
| Billing | RTX A2000 | GB300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| On-demand | -- /GPU/hr from $0.14 | -- /GPU/hr from $18.00 | |
| Reserved | -- /GPU/hr from $1.01 (1 mo) | On request | |
| Spot | -- /GPU/hr from $0.08 | Sold out |
Heads up: A provider's own page may quote a different figure, for example on tax, region or a promotion. A monthly-only plan shows a derived hourly rate. Medians are across providers, one vote each, so a large catalog does not outweigh a small one. No median for on-demand, reserved and spot on the RTX A2000 and on-demand on the GB300: we only show one when at least 3 providers list the GPU on that billing type. Verify before provisioning. More on how we price.
Price history
RTX A2000 vs GB300 price history
Weekly median on-demand price per GPU per hour
Specs comparison
| Spec | RTX A2000 | GB300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory | |||
| Capacity | 12 GB GDDR6 | 288 GB HBM3e | 24x more on GB300 |
| Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 8,000 GB/s | 28x higher on GB300 |
| Bus width | 192-bit | 8,192-bit | 43x wider on GB300 |
| Compute · dense | |||
| FP4 | Not supported | 15,000 TFLOPS | GB300 only |
| FP8 | Not supported | 5,000 TFLOPS | GB300 only |
| FP16 / BF16 | 31.9 TFLOPS | 2,500 TFLOPS | 78x higher on GB300 |
| INT8 | 165 TOPS | ||
| FP32 | 8 TFLOPS | 80 TFLOPS | 10x higher on GB300 |
| FP64 | Not supported | 1.3 TFLOPS | GB300 only |
| Platform | |||
| Interconnect | PCIe only | NVLink 1,800 GB/s | NVLink on GB300 only |
| Board power | 70 W | 1,400 W | 20x higher on GB300 |
| Released | Q3 2021 | Q1 2025 | 4 years newer on GB300 |
| Precision | |||
| Supported formats | FP16BF16TF32FP32INT4INT8 | FP4FP6FP8FP16BF16TF32FP32FP64INT8 | |
Figures are for each model's headline configuration. Where a form factor carries a different number, it is named under the figure.
Compute: Vendor peak figures, dense and per GPU. Not measured throughput.
Source: RTX A2000 datasheet and GB300 datasheet.
Where to rent them
Providers that rent these GPUs, with each one's cheapest rate. No provider we track offers both right now.
| Provider | RTX A2000 | GB300 |
|---|---|---|
Vast.ai
USA
|
$0.14 /GPU/hr On-demand | -- |
Runpod
USA
|
$0.12 /GPU/hr On-demand | -- |
Oracle Cloud
USA
|
-- | $18.00 /GPU/hr On-demand NVL |
AWS
USA
|
-- | On request Reserved |
CoreWeave
USA
|
-- | On request Custom NVL |
Gcore
Luxembourg
|
-- | On request Custom NVL |
Nebius
Netherlands
|
-- | On request Custom NVL |
Together AI
USA
|
-- | On request Custom NVL |
Verda
Finland
|
-- | $9.15 /GPU/hr On-demand SXM |
Similar GPUs
Other comparisons in the same class.
-
Nvidia L4
24 GB GDDR6 · data center card
From $0.27 /GPU/hr Compare -
Nvidia T4
16 GB GDDR6 · data center card
From $0.11 /GPU/hr Compare
-
Nvidia A4000
16 GB GDDR6 · 56% more bandwidth than the RTX A2000
From $0.09 /GPU/hr Compare
-
Nvidia B300
288 GB HBM3e · released Q1 2025
From $6.50 /GPU/hr Compare
-
Nvidia B200
180 GB HBM3e · released Q1 2024
From $3.75 /GPU/hr Compare
Our data for Nvidia RTX A2000 was last updated on Sept. 14, 2026, and for Nvidia GB300 on Sept. 14, 2026.