The A100 is newer, with 20x the memory and 15x the bandwidth. The GTX 1650 is cheaper right now.
At a glance
Memory
20x more on A100
- A100
- 80 GB
- GTX 1650
- 4 GB
Memory bandwidth
15x higher on A100
- A100
- 1,935 GB/s
- GTX 1650
- 128 GB/s
Cheapest on-demand
95% cheaper on GTX 1650
- A100
- $0.37 /GPU/hr
- GTX 1650
- $0.02 /GPU/hr
Price comparison
Median price per GPU per hour by billing type, with the cheapest listing under it.
| Billing | A100 | GTX 1650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| On-demand | $1.77 /GPU/hr from $0.37 | -- /GPU/hr from $0.02 | |
| Reserved | $1.43 /GPU/hr from $0.36 (3 mo) | -- /GPU/hr from $0.09 (24 mo) | |
| Spot | $0.96 /GPU/hr from $0.23 | -- /GPU/hr from $0.01 |
Heads up: A provider's own page may quote a different figure, for example on tax, region or a promotion. A monthly-only plan shows a derived hourly rate. Medians are across providers, one vote each, so a large catalog does not outweigh a small one. No median for on-demand, reserved and spot on the GTX 1650: we only show one when at least 3 providers list the GPU on that billing type. Verify before provisioning. More on how we price.
Price history
A100 vs GTX 1650 price history
Weekly median on-demand price per GPU per hour
Specs comparison
| Spec | A100 | GTX 1650 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory | |||
| Capacity | 80 GB HBM2e 40 GB on SXM, PCIe | 4 GB GDDR5 | 20x more on A100 |
| Bandwidth | 1,935 GB/s 2,039 GB/s on SXM 1,555 GB/s on SXM, PCIe | 128 GB/s | 15x higher on A100 |
| Bus width | 5,120-bit | 128-bit | 40x wider on A100 |
| Compute · dense | |||
| FP16 / BF16 | 312 TFLOPS | 6.0 TFLOPS | 52x higher on A100 |
| INT8 | 624 TOPS | Not supported | A100 only |
| FP32 | 19.5 TFLOPS | 3.0 TFLOPS | 6.5x higher on A100 |
| FP64 | 9.7 TFLOPS | Not supported | A100 only |
| Platform | |||
| Interconnect | NVLink 600 GB/s | PCIe only | NVLink on A100 only |
| Board power | 300 W | 75 W | 4x higher on A100 |
| Released | Q2 2020 | Q2 2019 | 13 months newer on A100 |
| Precision | |||
| Supported formats | FP16BF16TF32FP32FP64INT4INT8 | FP16FP32 | |
Figures are for each model's headline configuration. Where a form factor carries a different number, it is named under the figure.
Compute: Vendor peak figures, dense and per GPU. Not measured throughput.
Source: A100 datasheet and GTX 1650 datasheet.
Where to rent them
Providers that rent these GPUs, with each one's cheapest rate. Providers that rent both are listed first.
| Provider | A100 | GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
Vast.ai
USA
|
$0.40 /GPU/hr On-demand SXM | $0.68 /GPU/hr On-demand |
GPU.ai
UAE
|
$0.37 /GPU/hr On-demand | -- |
Jarvislabs
India
|
$0.89 /GPU/hr On-demand | -- |
Runpod
USA
|
$1.00 /GPU/hr On-demand SXM | -- |
Lium
Distributed
|
$1.01 /GPU/hr On-demand SXM | -- |
Thunder Compute
USA
|
$1.09 /GPU/hr On-demand | -- |
Massed Compute
USA
|
$1.35 /GPU/hr On-demand | -- |
Packet·ai
USA
|
$1.43 /GPU/hr On-demand | -- |
Salad
Distributed
|
-- | $0.0200 /GPU/hr On-demand |
Database Mart
USA
|
-- | $0.09 /GPU/hr Reserved |
48 providers list the A100 and 3 the GTX 1650. Every listing is on the A100 page and the GTX 1650 page.
Similar GPUs
Other comparisons in the same class.
-
Nvidia H100
80 GB HBM3 · 73% more bandwidth than the A100
From $1.73 /GPU/hr Compare -
Nvidia RTX 5090
32 GB GDDR7 · PCIe only
From $0.35 /GPU/hr Compare
-
Nvidia RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X · 48% less bandwidth than the A100
From $0.33 /GPU/hr Compare
-
Nvidia RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 · 2.8x the bandwidth of the GTX 1650
From $0.05 /GPU/hr Compare
-
Nvidia RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 · 75% more bandwidth than the GTX 1650
From $0.07 /GPU/hr Compare
Our data for Nvidia A100 was last updated on Sept. 14, 2026, and for Nvidia GTX 1650 on Sept. 14, 2026.