AMD Radeon Pro V520
vs
Nvidia GB300
The GB300 is newer, with 36x the memory and 16x the bandwidth. The Radeon Pro V520 is cheaper right now.
At a glance
Memory
36x more on GB300
- Radeon Pro V520
- 8 GB
- GB300
- 288 GB
Memory bandwidth
16x higher on GB300
- Radeon Pro V520
- 512 GB/s
- GB300
- 8,000 GB/s
Cheapest on-demand
98% cheaper on Radeon Pro V520
- Radeon Pro V520
- $0.38 /GPU/hr
- GB300
- $18.00 /GPU/hr
Price comparison
Median price per GPU per hour by billing type, with the cheapest listing under it.
| Billing | Radeon Pro V520 | GB300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| On-demand | -- /GPU/hr from $0.38 | -- /GPU/hr from $18.00 | |
| Reserved | No reserved listings | On request | |
| Spot | No spot listings | Sold out |
Heads up: A provider's own page may quote a different figure, for example on tax, region or a promotion. A monthly-only plan shows a derived hourly rate. Medians are across providers, one vote each, so a large catalog does not outweigh a small one. No median for on-demand on the Radeon Pro V520 and on-demand on the GB300: we only show one when at least 3 providers list the GPU on that billing type. Verify before provisioning. More on how we price.
Price history
Radeon Pro V520 vs GB300 price history
Weekly median on-demand price per GPU per hour
Specs comparison
| Spec | Radeon Pro V520 | GB300 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory | |||
| Capacity | 8 GB HBM2 | 288 GB HBM3e | 36x more on GB300 |
| Bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 8,000 GB/s | 16x higher on GB300 |
| Bus width | 2,048-bit | 8,192-bit | 4x wider on GB300 |
| Compute · dense | |||
| FP4 | Not supported | 15,000 TFLOPS | GB300 only |
| FP8 | Not supported | 5,000 TFLOPS | GB300 only |
| FP16 / BF16 | 14.8 TFLOPS | 2,500 TFLOPS | 169x higher on GB300 |
| INT8 | 165 TOPS | ||
| FP32 | 7.4 TFLOPS | 80 TFLOPS | 11x higher on GB300 |
| FP64 | Not supported | 1.3 TFLOPS | GB300 only |
| Platform | |||
| Interconnect | PCIe only | NVLink 1,800 GB/s | NVLink on GB300 only |
| Board power | 225 W | 1,400 W | 6.2x higher on GB300 |
| Released | Q2 2020 | Q1 2025 | 5 years newer on GB300 |
| Precision | |||
| Supported formats | FP16FP32INT4INT8 | FP4FP6FP8FP16BF16TF32FP32FP64INT8 | |
Compute: Vendor peak figures, dense and per GPU. Not measured throughput.
Source: Radeon Pro V520 datasheet and GB300 datasheet.
Where to rent them
Providers that rent these GPUs, with each one's cheapest rate. Providers that rent both are listed first.
| Provider | Radeon Pro V520 | GB300 |
|---|---|---|
AWS
USA
|
$0.38 /GPU/hr On-demand | On request Reserved |
Oracle Cloud
USA
|
-- | $18.00 /GPU/hr On-demand NVL |
CoreWeave
USA
|
-- | On request Custom NVL |
Gcore
Luxembourg
|
-- | On request Custom NVL |
Nebius
Netherlands
|
-- | On request Custom NVL |
Together AI
USA
|
-- | On request Custom NVL |
Verda
Finland
|
-- | $9.06 /GPU/hr On-demand SXM |
Similar GPUs
Other comparisons in the same class.
-
Nvidia T4
16 GB GDDR6 · 41% less bandwidth than the Radeon Pro V520
From $0.11 /GPU/hr Compare
-
Nvidia A10G
24 GB GDDR6 · 17% more bandwidth than the Radeon Pro V520
From $1.00 /GPU/hr Compare
-
Nvidia M60
8 GB GDDR5 · 69% less bandwidth than the Radeon Pro V520
From $0.75 /GPU/hr Compare
-
Nvidia B300
288 GB HBM3e · released Q1 2025
From $6.50 /GPU/hr Compare
-
Nvidia B200
180 GB HBM3e · released Q1 2024
From $3.75 /GPU/hr Compare
Our data for AMD Radeon Pro V520 was last updated on Sept. 14, 2026, and for Nvidia GB300 on Sept. 14, 2026.