AMD Radeon Pro V520
vs
Nvidia RTX A2000
The Radeon Pro V520 has 78% more bandwidth, while the RTX A2000 is newer and has 50% more memory. The RTX A2000 is cheaper right now.
At a glance
Memory
50% more on RTX A2000
- Radeon Pro V520
- 8 GB
- RTX A2000
- 12 GB
Memory bandwidth
78% higher on Radeon Pro V520
- Radeon Pro V520
- 512 GB/s
- RTX A2000
- 288 GB/s
Cheapest on-demand
71% cheaper on RTX A2000
- Radeon Pro V520
- $0.38 /GPU/hr
- RTX A2000
- $0.11 /GPU/hr
Price comparison
Median price per GPU per hour by billing type, with the cheapest listing under it.
| Billing | Radeon Pro V520 | RTX A2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| On-demand | -- /GPU/hr from $0.38 | -- /GPU/hr from $0.11 | |
| Reserved | No reserved listings | -- /GPU/hr from $1.20 (1 mo) | |
| Spot | No spot listings | -- /GPU/hr from $0.05 |
Heads up: A provider's own page may quote a different figure, for example on tax, region or a promotion. A monthly-only plan shows a derived hourly rate. Medians are across providers, one vote each, so a large catalog does not outweigh a small one. No median for on-demand on the Radeon Pro V520 and on-demand, reserved and spot on the RTX A2000: we only show one when at least 3 providers list the GPU on that billing type. Verify before provisioning. More on how we price.
Price history
Radeon Pro V520 vs RTX A2000 price history
Weekly median on-demand price per GPU per hour
Specs comparison
| Spec | Radeon Pro V520 | RTX A2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory | |||
| Capacity | 8 GB HBM2 | 12 GB GDDR6 | 50% more on RTX A2000 |
| Bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 288 GB/s | 78% higher on Radeon Pro V520 |
| Bus width | 2,048-bit | 192-bit | 11x wider on Radeon Pro V520 |
| Compute · dense | |||
| FP16 / BF16 | 14.8 TFLOPS | 31.9 TFLOPS | 2.2x higher on RTX A2000 |
| FP32 | 7.4 TFLOPS | 8 TFLOPS | 8% higher on RTX A2000 |
| Platform | |||
| Interconnect | PCIe only | PCIe only | |
| Board power | 225 W | 70 W | 3.2x higher on Radeon Pro V520 |
| Released | Q2 2020 | Q3 2021 | 15 months newer on RTX A2000 |
| Precision | |||
| Supported formats | FP16FP32INT4INT8 | FP16BF16TF32FP32INT4INT8 | |
Figures are for each model's headline configuration. Where a form factor carries a different number, it is named under the figure.
Compute: Vendor peak figures, dense and per GPU. Not measured throughput.
Source: Radeon Pro V520 datasheet and RTX A2000 datasheet.
Where to rent them
Providers that rent these GPUs, with each one's cheapest rate. No provider we track offers both right now.
| Provider | Radeon Pro V520 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
AWS
USA
|
$0.38 /GPU/hr On-demand | -- |
Vast.ai
USA
|
-- | $0.11 /GPU/hr On-demand |
Runpod
USA
|
-- | $0.12 /GPU/hr On-demand |
Similar GPUs
Other comparisons in the same class.
-
Nvidia T4
16 GB GDDR6 · 41% less bandwidth than the Radeon Pro V520
From $0.15 /GPU/hr Compare
-
Nvidia A10G
24 GB GDDR6 · 17% more bandwidth than the Radeon Pro V520
From $1.00 /GPU/hr Compare
-
Nvidia M60
8 GB GDDR5 · 69% less bandwidth than the Radeon Pro V520
From $0.75 /GPU/hr Compare
-
Nvidia L4
24 GB GDDR6 · data center card
From $0.32 /GPU/hr Compare
Our data for AMD Radeon Pro V520 was last updated on Sept. 14, 2026, and for Nvidia RTX A2000 on Sept. 14, 2026.