AMD MI350X
vs
Nvidia A100
The MI350X is newer, with 3.6x the memory and 4.1x the bandwidth. 1 provider lists it, against 48 for the A100.
At a glance
Memory
3.6x more on MI350X
- MI350X
- 288 GB
- A100
- 80 GB
Memory bandwidth
4.1x higher on MI350X
- MI350X
- 8.00 TB/s
- A100
- 1.94 TB/s
Cheapest on-demand
MI350X is not sold on demand
- MI350X
- --
- A100
- $0.53 /GPU/hr
Price comparison
Median price per GPU per hour by billing type, with the cheapest listing under it.
| Billing | MI350X | A100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| On-demand | No on-demand listings | $1.86 /GPU/hr from $0.53 | |
| Reserved | -- /GPU/hr from $4.76 (12 mo) | $1.60 /GPU/hr from $0.66 (24 mo) | |
| Spot | -- /GPU/hr from $2.46 | $0.93 /GPU/hr from $0.27 |
Heads up: A provider's own page may quote a different figure, for example on tax, region or a promotion. A monthly-only plan shows a derived hourly rate. Medians are across providers, one vote each, so a large catalog does not outweigh a small one. No median for reserved and spot on the MI350X: we only show one when at least 3 providers list the GPU on that billing type. Verify before provisioning. More on how we price.
Price history
MI350X vs A100 price history
Weekly median on-demand price per GPU per hour
Specs comparison
| Spec | MI350X | A100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory | |||
| Capacity | 288 GB HBM3e | 80 GB HBM2e 40 GB on SXM, PCIe | 3.6x more on MI350X |
| Bandwidth | 8,000 GB/s | 1,935 GB/s 2,039 GB/s on SXM 1,555 GB/s on SXM, PCIe | 4.1x higher on MI350X |
| Bus width | 8,192-bit | 5,120-bit | 60% wider on MI350X |
| Compute · dense | |||
| FP4 | 9,227.5 TFLOPS | Not supported | MI350X only |
| FP8 | 4,614 TFLOPS | Not supported | MI350X only |
| FP16 / BF16 | 2,309.6 TFLOPS | 312 TFLOPS | 7.4x higher on MI350X |
| INT8 | 4,614 TOPS | 624 TOPS | 7.4x higher on MI350X |
| FP32 | 144.2 TFLOPS | 19.5 TFLOPS | 7.4x higher on MI350X |
| FP64 | 72.1 TFLOPS | 9.7 TFLOPS | 7.4x higher on MI350X |
| Platform | |||
| Interconnect | Infinity Fabric 1,075 GB/s | NVLink 600 GB/s | 79% higher on MI350X |
| Board power | 1,000 W | 300 W | 3.3x higher on MI350X |
| Released | Q2 2025 | Q2 2020 | 5 years newer on MI350X |
| Precision | |||
| Supported formats | FP4FP6FP8FP16BF16FP32FP64INT8 | FP16BF16TF32FP32FP64INT4INT8 | |
Figures are for each model's headline configuration. Where a form factor carries a different number, it is named under the figure.
Compute: Vendor peak figures, dense and per GPU. Not measured throughput.
Source: MI350X datasheet and A100 datasheet.
Where to rent them
Providers that rent these GPUs, with each one's cheapest rate. No provider we track offers both right now.
| Provider | MI350X | A100 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
$4.76 /GPU/hr Reserved | -- |
|
|
-- | $0.53 /GPU/hr On-demand SXM |
|
|
-- | $0.54 /GPU/hr On-demand |
|
|
-- | $0.89 /GPU/hr On-demand |
|
|
-- | $1.00 /GPU/hr On-demand SXM |
|
|
-- | $1.09 /GPU/hr On-demand |
|
|
-- | $1.22 /GPU/hr On-demand SXM |
|
|
-- | $1.35 /GPU/hr On-demand |
|
|
-- | $1.43 /GPU/hr On-demand |
1 provider list the MI350X and 48 the A100. Every listing is on the MI350X page and the A100 page.
Similar GPUs
Other comparisons in the same class.
Our data for AMD MI350X was last updated on Sept. 14, 2026, and for Nvidia A100 on Sept. 14, 2026.