Two AMD data center GPUs, one CDNA2 and one CDNA 4: 64 GB HBM2e against 288 GB HBM3e and 4.9x the memory bandwidth on the MI355X.
At a glance
Memory
- MI210
- 64 GB
- MI355X
- 288 GB
4.5x more on MI355X
Memory bandwidth
- MI210
- 1.64 TB/s
- MI355X
- 8.00 TB/s
4.9x higher on MI355X
Cheapest on-demand
- MI210
- --
- MI355X
- $8.60 /GPU/hr
MI210 is not sold on demand
Price comparison
Median price per GPU per hour by billing type, with the cheapest listing under it.
| Billing | MI210 | MI355X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| On-demand | No on-demand listings | -- /GPU/hr from $8.60 | |
| Reserved | -- /GPU/hr from $0.86 (1 mo) | No reserved listings | |
| Spot | No spot listings | -- /GPU/hr from $4.50 |
Heads up: A provider's own page may quote a different figure, for example on tax, region or a promotion. A monthly-only plan shows a derived hourly rate. Medians are across providers, one vote each, so a large catalog does not outweigh a small one. No median for reserved on the MI210 and on-demand and spot on the MI355X: we only show one when at least 3 providers list the GPU on that billing type. Verify before provisioning. More on how we price.
Price history
MI210 vs MI355X price history
Weekly median on-demand price per GPU per hour
Specs comparison
| Spec | MI210 | MI355X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory | |||
| Capacity | 64 GB HBM2e | 288 GB HBM3e | 4.5x more on MI355X |
| Bandwidth | 1,638 GB/s | 8,000 GB/s | 4.9x higher on MI355X |
| Bus width | 4,096-bit | 8,192-bit | 2x wider on MI355X |
| Compute · dense | |||
| FP4 | Not supported | 10,066.3 TFLOPS | MI355X only |
| FP8 | Not supported | 5,033.2 TFLOPS | MI355X only |
| FP16 / BF16 | 181 TFLOPS | 2,516.6 TFLOPS | 14x higher on MI355X |
| INT8 | 181 TOPS | 5,033.2 TOPS | 28x higher on MI355X |
| FP32 | 45.3 TFLOPS | 157.3 TFLOPS | 3.5x higher on MI355X |
| FP64 | 22.6 TFLOPS | 78.6 TFLOPS | 3.5x higher on MI355X |
| Platform | |||
| Interconnect | Infinity Fabric 300 GB/s | Infinity Fabric 1,075 GB/s | 3.6x higher on MI355X |
| Board power | 300 W | 1,400 W | 4.7x higher on MI355X |
| Released | Q1 2022 | Q2 2025 | 3 years newer on MI355X |
| Precision | |||
| Supported formats | FP16BF16FP32FP64INT4INT8 | FP4FP6FP8FP16BF16FP32FP64INT8 | |
Compute: Vendor peak figures, dense and per GPU. Not measured throughput.
Source: MI210 datasheet and MI355X datasheet.
Where to rent them
Providers listing these GPUs, those with both first, so you can switch without moving clouds.
| Provider | MI210 /GPU/hr | MI355X /GPU/hr |
|---|---|---|
Leaseweb
|
Reserved (1mo) $0.86 | -- |
Oracle Cloud
|
-- | On-Demand $8.60 |
DigitalOcean
|
-- | Spot $4.50 |
TensorWave
|
-- | Custom $2.95 |
Vultr
|
-- | Spot $2.59 |
Similar GPUs
Other comparisons in the same class.
-
Nvidia A100
From $0.40 /GPU/hr Compare -
AMD MI300X
From $2.39 /GPU/hr Compare -
Nvidia L40S
From $0.38 /GPU/hr Compare -
Nvidia H100
From $1.30 /GPU/hr Compare -
Nvidia B200
From $3.75 /GPU/hr Compare
Our data for AMD MI210 was last updated on Sept. 7, 2026, and for AMD MI355X on Sept. 7, 2026.